Why Are Rentals Affordable All of a Sudden?

As someone who likes to stay on top of what’s happening in Real Estate and the economy. I have noticed something happening that honestly, I’m not sure many people saw coming. Rental prices are dropping in major city centers across Canada, and have been on a slow but steady decline for a good 6-8 months. The main reason for this change simply has to do with a supply and demand problem (on many levels), and it’s all happening at the same time, right now.

Demand:

Let’s talk about demand first. Allow me to tell you a bit of a short story about recent events, namely something called COVID-19. The effects of the pandemic are beginning to show up in so many different aspects of society, and what I’m going to talk about here is another example of how generational of a shift was caused by COVID. Prior to COVID, people knew we had a bit of a housing shortage in Canada, in bigger cities multiple offers were common, but politicians were making some small policy changes to try and address some of the problems. Fair housing plan, first time home buyer tax rebates etc. But these were really drops in the bucket, and I don’t know that any politicians were earnest sitting down and thinking to themselves that there was a real problem here and that things needed to change. Enter the pandemic, low interest rates, followed up quickly by a completely crazy housing market. What COIVD did, was shine the worlds biggest spotlight on housing and made the entire country realize how bad housing could really get if we let things go too far. All of a sudden, every level of government is talking about housing, all of a sudden we’re talking about educating trades workers again and doing something to fill in these gaps in our economy that have been growing for decades leading to the problems that we are now experiencing.

Interest Rates:

So what did the various levels of government do in order to try and reduce this crazy demand in housing that was brought on by COVID? Many things. The Bank of Canada (not technically the government, although still a government entity?), increase interest rates by 4.75% over the course of 1 year, the fastest rate increases in history, which made housing extremely unaffordable at current market prices. Almost instantly, a ton of demand dried up because, financially, it became a horrible deal to purchase a home. Real estate prices move in the downward direction a lot slower than they move in the upward direction, which meant that while the cost of owning a home climbed in lockstep with rate increases, prices did not fall at the same pace. Even with these high interest rates reducing the pool of potential buyers significantly, there’s just so little supply, that some people who really need a home, were still buying homes. We didn’t see a huge flood of inventory (until about a year or two later), because most people who were already in their homes might not have to renew their mortgage for another 3-5 years and don’t need to sell. Rates were a big hit to demand, but everyone was finally beginning to realize the gravity of the situation, and the Bank of Canada made it pretty clear that the high rates would eventually come down once they dealt with inflation. So while the oven was still hot, governments began to put other policies into place.

Foreign Buyers Tax:

In some provinces, mainly the larger ones, foreign investor taxes were put into place in order to reduce speculation on the Canadian housing market as an investment vehicle. Canada is a very stable country, so if you have money from another country that is less stable, why not just park it in a piece of land located in Canada, and as a side benefit watch the investment grow. Makes perfect sense from an outsider point of view. But what this means is that local “middle class” people have to compete with the global rich, who may want to send their children to school in Canada or for whatever other reason have an interest in real estate. There have been arguments made about whether of not the percentage of foreign investment in Canada was actually making a dent at all in the cost of housing and what even counts as foreign investment. But on the whole, if the goal of this policy was to reduce demand, a 25-30% tax on foreign investment is one way to accomplish that.

Foreign Buyers Ban:

Following this policy, but at the federal level, we had a foreign buyer BAN for 2 years starting Jan 1, 2023. Which has been extended for an additional 2 years until Jan 1, 2027, and who knows, maybe it’ll be extended again. What this means is that if you weren’t a citizen, or don’t have Permanent Residency (PR) status in Canada, you CANNOT buy real estate here, at all. So even if you were willing to pay the provincial tax of 25-30%, with the hopes of getting a rebate (within 4 years) once you have your PR, you can’t do that anymore. Again, if the goal of the policy is to reduce demand for housing. This will have likely accomplished that. However, a potential side effect of this policy is driving up rent prices, because there may be a situation where you have a highly skilled worker who comes here and is making really good money or may have the means to purchase a home, but now they are forced to rent. Which means more demand for rental housing from people who are barred from buying, even if they plan to make Canada their home long term. I would consider this a more artificial and temporary reduction in demand, because these skilled workers will probably buy after getting PR.

Less Immigration:

Wow what a great transition, let’s talk a bit more about PR shall we. Quite recently, the government has been walking back the number of people that can apply for PR and officially immigrate to Canada. This has made the process of becoming a Canadian citizen a lot more competitive, and if you combine this “reduce immigration” policy with the previous policy which only allows citizens or PR holders to purchase homes, you will see a notable reduction in demand for buying housing. There will literally be fewer people who are legally able to purchase homes in the coming years. That’s not technically correct since we’ll be increasing the number of Canadian’s every year while still not building enough. The pace of new entrants will still be outpacing construction. But at least with these new policies things will get worse slower than before.

Fewer Students:

One final thing on the demand front deals with students and rental housing. Students make up quite significant portion of the rental market. Prior to, and just after the pandemic. The government was allowing pretty much anyone who would be accepted by a college or university, to come to Canada and study. Which in theory is an ok idea since we hope those people will stay, get a good job, and contribute positively to the productivity of our economy (not to mention spend money while they are here). But this unregulated environment led to some bad actors taking advantage of the situation. In some cases students were getting scammed by private “career colleges” which sold a promise of a Canadian education, and frequently didn’t deliver even the basics. It was a bad look on Canada, and brutal on students that took a huge risk spending international student tuition to get an education in Canada.

Aside About Higher Ed:

Additionally, at some point down the line, higher education institutions, including the prestigious ones. Began to cater their “services”, to the international student audience. Why? Because international students pay 2-4x the tuition rates of domestic students and universities have been dealing with consistent budget cuts from the provincial government over the course of decades (god forbid we help to pay to educate our future workforce). As an aside, I feel very strongly that higher education should be almost free in Canada for locals (which means more government funding). It’s ok if you disagree, but I would ask that you think about the implications on young people when education leads to debt, we are handicapping them before they even begin working. Additionally, if it’s too expensive, some people end up forgoing education altogether. More highly structured education after high school isn’t always the right answer. But, I think fundamentally we can all agree that continuing to get educated is a good thing and more funding for higher education is a great way to do that.

After years of cuts, universities felt the need to increase international student enrollment in order to make up for the difference, and the funnel was effectively endless. Obviously, this all came to a head and some people began to tell their MPs about these issues, namely scam colleges, and shortly after we see a cap on student visas. What does this means for housing? Likely there will be less rental demand in major metro areas where higher education institutions are located.

Supply:

Ok, I think that wraps up the demand side of the equation. Excuse me while I go and watch the 4 Nations Faceoff Canada vs. USA game (Canada lost, dang). Supply is up next, and this is where things get really fascinating.

Rents at 18 Month Low:

A report from Urbanation, who do really good research on housing in the Greater Toronto Area explained in October 2024 that average rents, especially in large cities across Canada have been dropping. An even more recent report by BNN said that rents across Canada have hit an 18 month low in January declining 4.4 percent to $2100. Rents are still 5.2% higher than 2 years earlier. But this is still a welcome sign for many renters. So what’s going on here?

Flood of New Supply:

We’re in a very interesting moment in time right now. As mentioned in the demand section, we’ve done a pretty good across the board job of slowing demand. At the same time, we have a flood of new condo completions hitting the market, actually a record amount for 2024, 29,800 in the GTA. In a normal year there might be 20,000 completions, which means we saw a 50% increase in inventory hitting the market. Approximately half of these new condos were listed for rent, since many owners are reading the writing on the wall and can see that they won’t be able to sell at a good price. In fact they may not even get the price they paid out of the condo. The pandemic also slowed and delayed condo completions, and 2024 just happened to be the year of reckoning where everything hit the market all at once. Additionally, purpose built rental completions were 5,537 in 2024, which is 86% above the 10 year average. In 2023 completions were 5,779 units.

What This Moment Tell Us:

When you combine the twofold pressures of ton’s of supply for sale, a smaller pool of buyers than usual, more nationalistic policies, higher interest rates than usual, and a “stable” housing market which is moving very slowly in the downward direction. Many new condos and purpose built rentals hitting the market. Leading new condo owners to attempt to rent out their units because they are unable to sell them right now. We have accidentally created an amazing case study that proves the point that politicians, and economists have been shouting from the rooftops. How do we make housing more affordable? We build more. Simple. This moment in time proves that if we build more, and build more variety, and have a constant flow of new housing coming onto the market, it will very likely relieve the pressures that we’ve been seeing on the housing market and make housing more affordable. On top of managing demand, filling gaps in our economy with tradespeople, and building a variety of housing (we don’t need to exclusively build detached low-rise or 60 storey high-rise). If apartments almost become a dime a dozen, a commodity, instead of something you need to be making six figures even to afford a rental. That will put a lot of downward pressure on prices and people will be less feral when trying to bid on a home or a rental.

Quebec is Doing It Better:

We have a case study in Canada that we can look to, Montreal and Quebec. In general, Quebec has not seen the same problems with cost of housing that we have. The pandemic did make things worse for them as well. But I was wondering why they don’t seem to be having as severe of a crisis as we do in Ontario and BC. I learned that a few reasons for their ability to managing housing costs a bit better is because they have fewer exclusionary zoning by-laws, aka. They build a larger variety of housing. The home construction market in Montreal is able to adapt much quicker to changes in demand, they also don’t exclusively rely on high-rise condo’s to solve their supply problems. They build a variety of housing types, like 3-4 storey apartment buildings. That are able to be built quicker and meet demand quicker. Our supply is very inelastic in Ontario, which the supply in Quebec and Montreal tends to be more elastic preventing prices from going to crazy. They also prove the point that the fundamental issue surrounding housing is a simply supply and demand issue. We do have to look into all the layers that cause a supply problem, or lead to unusually high demand. But if you boil it down, we need to build a whole lot more, become a lot more creative, and as 2024 proved, the problem can get better. Thanks for reading, hope you found this interesting.

Keep Investing,

-Oliver

Why Are So Many Realtors Broke?

Newsletter 30– Jan 29, 2025

Who’s Making All the Money?

This idea came back to my mind because I heard in the news that the Toronto Real Estate Board saw a decrease in membership for the first time in 20 years. The real estate business was becoming a lot harder for a lot more people. The number of sales from the peak crazy year 2021 has been cut in half, which means literally half as much to go around. So this post is going to be a bit of an analysis about this problem, as well as talking about which realtors are able to continue doing this over the long term compared to those who are leaving the business. I also want to throw in a bit of my own story here, because I’m learning that being a Realtor is much harder than the successful people make it look.

The Famous # of Sales Chart:

This is a topic that if you’ve ever looked into the real estate industry you’ll know comes up time and time again. I’m going to use the area I work in, Toronto, as the case study, but I’m almost certain if you look anywhere else in Canada or the US you’ll find the exact same thing. Here’s a chart talking about the number of home sales each Realtor made in the Greater Toronto Area in 2021.

In 2021 it was a record year for home sales in Toronto with the Covid vaccine being distributed and the interest rates so low to stimulate the economy. 121,000 sales were recorded, which we can assume for simplicity that each had 2 agents on either side. This means a total of 242,000 transactions were completed.

As the chart helpfully points out 32.5% of realtors made ZERO sales. Which is a TON of Realtors. I’ll get into the numbers a bit later, but doing ZERO sales means that the decision to be a realtor is costing people. From my own lived experience, I’ve averaged around $7,000 in random licensing fees, desk fees at my brokerage, and misc fees, just to stay licensed and run my business. Which quite honestly I do very cheaply compared to the marketing spend of some other Realtors. I know there are cheaper ways to stay licensed than what I’m doing, for example going with discount brokerages. But it would still run me probably around $3,000 a year bare minimum to stay licensed. Which isn’t an insignificant amount of money.

Looking at some more stats. The average home price in the GTA at the time was around 1.2 million dollars. Assuming an average commission of 2% after brokerage splits, fees, and expenses for listing a home and sharing a commission with another agent. The net income on a sale per side would have been around $24,000. In my opinion, this means that you’d need to be making around 3+ sales per year in order to survive in the business, considering all the other fees and targeting the median income of around $60,000. Doing 3 sales and having a net income of $60,000, is a pretty nice deal, but I’ve also learned that it’s not something everyone is capable of doing. As evidenced by the chart, the competition is stiff, and the few winners really take the lions share in this business. The top 10% of realtors do almost all of the business while the other 90% are picking up scraps by comparison. So what makes these top 10% or top 1% so special?

Visibility Trumps Ability:

Going back to the chart for a second, you’ll see that based on my rough math on 3 sales, about 50% of realtors are making barely enough to get by or not getting by at all. So what are they doing? Are half of realtors working part-time? Are they delusional? What’s going on? I think it’s a bit of everything above. Many people who are doing less than 3 sales per year are probably doing it part time, maybe they only sell their own properties, or they just aren’t cut out for the competition. They my also just be unwilling to spend money to market themselves, which as you’ll see below. Is quite an important thing to do.

I think there should be a big disclaimer before people enter the real estate industry that they need to budget around $10,000-20,000/year or more just to dedicate towards a marketing campaign. This might seem like a lot of money to someone just starting out. But I can tell you from what I’ve seen working on a team the amount of time, money, and effort it takes to really take this career seriously. If you aren’t willing to invest either an enormous amount of time or money in marketing, you will likely die a slow painful death in this industry along with the 90% of agents who do less than 10 sales a year.

Most Sellers Sell With The First Agent They Call:

Real estate is an industry of visibility. There have been stats and datapoints showing that most people only know the names of 2 or 3 realtors off the top of their head. When they go to sell their home, most homeowners only interview 1 realtor (per National Association of Realtors in the US). What this means is that you have to be the first Realtor who comes to mind for a homeowner. But most homeowners only sell once per 7 years. So if you want to be doing lots of business, you need to be the first that comes to mind in hundreds, if not thousands of people’s minds. If you are able to accomplish this you’ll likely be one of, if not the only one potential sellers will call to list their house. You can be a complete dunce, an arsehole, rude, etc. BUT, as long as people know your name, and you’re the first one they call. You’ll likely do more than ok in the real estate business.

Selling Agents Rule The Business:

Another important thing to note is that most if not all of the Realtors who are in the top 1% bubble, are primarily selling agents. Listing homes also happens to be one of the only ways that this business is sustainable long-term. The reason is simple to see. In most markets, but especially hot markets, being a listing agent trumps being a buying agent any day of the week. In a market where there is a ton of competition, and say for example there are 15 offers on a property and the sale numbers are going insane. Only 1 of the buyer agents will earn a commission, and the other 14 agents will have to continue to show their clients properties. It may take them 10-20 or more listings until they earn a commission. If the buyers agent is really unlucky or the buyers aren’t very motivated, they might have spent months or years with clients and never make a sale. However, as the selling agent, you’re almost guaranteed to earn a commission from your listing in a hot market. Obviously, some sellers have unrealistic expectations, may be unmotivated, or the house might not sell for various other reasons.

Even in a cold market, as the selling agent, you still have the advantage. You aren’t worried about scheduling appointments, or doing x number of showings per week in order to try and find something your clients like. You make sure to present the property well, take good photos, set a good price, work with your sellers, and wait for other agents to bring you offers and you negotiate for your clients. As a listing agent it’s feasible to have 20 listings up at a time. Buyers agents will show your listings to their buyers, that’s like having an army of people working for you to get the house sold. But once you’ve staged, listed, and marketed the property on all the usual channels, as a Listing Agent it becomes a waiting game, rather than a chasing game, and you can spend your time seeking other listings. Meanwhile, as a buying agent it is almost impossible to show 20 properties in a day and even if your clients do find one that they like, you may get beat out by other buyers or the seller may be unwilling to sell, and you have to keep on keeping on. Being a buying agent simply does not scale beyond a certain point.

What’s holding Agents back?

I’m sure you’ve heard stories of people who enter the business and immediately are making tons of money and tons of sales. How are they doing it? The simple answer is that they are probably much more willing to spend money and take risks than your average realtor. They probably have a pre-existing network of people that already know and trust them and have good relationships with. They’re also probably a competitive person. Lastly, they understand that the name of the game in real estate is selling and put their time and energy into becoming a selling agent not a buying agent. Which is why almost every single real estate billboard you see talks about how “I’ll sell your home in x days!”, or “Our listings sell x% above market average”, or one I really like, “top 10 things to do when selling your home. 1. Call me. I’ll handle the other 9.” All of these Realtors with these big marketing campaigns know that selling is the way to go. Side benefit, you might get a few buyers calling you as well. No reason to turn down business.

Concluding Thoughts:

I think we can surmise that the 50% of agents who aren’t surviving are likely missing one of the key components I mentioned. Likely, they aren’t willing to put in the time or the money that is required to become the top agent that people will think to call when they sell their homes. They probably aren’t thinking long term about the business model and what is sustainable. I think a lot of agents may also be scared of trying to list a home. From experience I know that it can seem like a daunting task to get a home picture ready and staged properly, you’ll likely have to put in some money up front to do it the right way as well, with the possibility you don’t see a penny of that money ever again. But it’s important to realize that if you’re unwilling to learn how to be a listing agent, you should probably exit stage left before you go broke. You’re competing for peanuts with the 90%, not the big prizes with the top 10%.

That’s going to do it for now, this post is a bit more brief than usual. I originally wanted to discuss a bit more about my own finances. TL;DR: I’ve discovered that between owning a car and being a realtor I’m burning around $14,500 per year. I’m not sure how relevant the discussion about my personal life goals and finances would be to this blog. But I’ll just leave you with this thought. Owning a car is not a good financial decision, unless it makes you much more money than it costs you. Being a realtor who does less than 3 sales a year and doesn’t have a business plan that leads to being a listing agent is also not a good financial decision. In order to be a Realtor you almost certainly need a car. Meaning that owning a car solely to be a Realtor, can be a VERY bad financial decision if you’re not serious. Thanks for reading, hope you found it interesting or useful. As always.

Keep Investing,

Oliver Foote

Newsletter Email Archive Sent: Jan 29, 2025:

Newsletter #30: The Realtor’s Dilemma. DeepSeek AI. 0.25% BoC Rate Cut!

Subheading: The blog this week is discussing: “Why are most Realtors broke?” You may have heard about why some Realtors perform better than others. There are some fundamental reasons, and I discuss what those are in the post. Also BoC cut rates by 0.25bps! Will this help buyers? Certainly should.

This Weeks Blog Post:

Why Are Most Realtors Broke?:

  • The question, should you list homes or should you help buyers?
  • Why some Realtors do better and outcompete others.
  • The crazy cost of Realtor fees, just for the privilege of being an agent.
  • And more…

Read the full article here: https://oliverfoote.ca/why-are-so-many-realtors-broke/

Market News:

  • The Bank of Canada cut interest rates on Wednesday Jan 29th. This means that the overnight lending rate now sits at 3%. For us normies, that means that the prime lending rate at banks is now at 5.2%. With some banks offering prime – 0.3% on 5 year variable rate mortgages. That puts the mortgage at 4.9%. The 5 year bond yield, which determines fixed rate mortgages, is sitting at 2.8%, which is nearing a 52-week low. You’ll likely start to see 5-year fixed rate mortgage below 4.5%, with some as low as 4.2%. If yields drop enough to the point where we start to see a leading 3 on mortgage interest rates, I believe this will be a psychological breaking point and people will return to the market in droves. Potentially just in time for the seasonally hotter Spring market. If yields continue to fluctuate the way they have been, or the tariff war heats up with the US. It is possible that yields go up, the BoC has suggested they may even have to raise rates again. This would mean that the market would be unlikely to see a significant rebound this year.
  • A new AI model just hit the Interweb, DeepSeek AI. This AI large language model (LLM) came out of nowhere from a Chinese company. They were able to train the model for a fraction of the cost of ChatGPT, while delivering comparable performance, and also being Open Source (free). This news caused the market to fall somewhat on Monday. NVIDIA, the leading chip maker supplying OpenAI (and all the other big tech firms) with very expensive AI hardware to run their learning models on, saw a dip that caused NVIDIA to lose $600 Billion dollars in market valuation in one day. The following day it recovered around half that loss. Another model built by this firm was able to compete and outperform with one of the best image generation models currently available.

Stock Market Performance as of Wednesday Jan 29, 2025:

S&P 500: 6,039.31 (+2.91% YTD)

NASDAQ: 19,632.32 (+1.82% YTD)

S&P/TSX Composite: 25,473.30 (+2.31% YTD)

Macroeconomics Statistics:

Canada’s CPI Inflation Dec 2024: 1.8% (0.1% Decrease from Nov 2024)

Current BoC Benchmark Interest Rate: 3.00% (0.25% Decrease on Jan 29, 2025)

Unemployment Rate Dec 2024: 6.7% (0.1% Decrease from Nov 2024)

Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Real Estate Stats – December 2024:

November 2024 Average Selling Price All Home Types: $1,067,186

Y-o-Y (comparing Decembers) % Change in Average Selling Price: -1.6%

YTD Number of MLS Sales: 67,610

YTD % Change in MLS Sales (compared to this time last year): +2.5%

Y-o-Y (comparing Decembers) % Change in MLS Sales: -1.8%

Number of MLS Sales in December:  3,359

Y-o-Y (comparing Decembers) % Change in Active Listings: +48.5%

Number of Active Listings in December: 15,393

Inventory Available: 4.58 Months (Increase from 3.71 Months in November 2024)

Market Type: Buyers Market

Investing $100,000 in Stocks vs. Real Estate 25 Years Ago

Update Dec 14, 2024: Added Newsletter Email Archive at End of Post.

This thought experiment has been floating around in my big ol’ brain for a little while now, and I was curious what the results would be. So this post is going to be a bit of a back-test of investing in stocks (index fund) vs. real estate (homeownership as an investment). I’m going to have to make a few assumptions, but I’m going to try and make them as realistic as possible for the sake of this post. Before jumping into the thought experiment I want to point out and outline a principle that is sometimes lost in the numbers when people are comparing real estate to other investments like stocks. 

Real estate is an insanely leveraged investment. Why? What does that mean? I didn’t know we’d be talking about Physics? Allow me to explain. Leverage in it’s most basic form is borrowing money from one person, to then turn around and invest. For example you might leverage 2x the money you have available to you. In stock terms this means that if your investment goes up 100% (doubles), you’ve made a 300% return (2x leverage + 2x return – 1x original investment). Let’s use real numbers to make this make more sense. Let’s say you have $100,000, you then go to the bank and say “hey, I have a great investment idea, my credit is great, will you lend me $100,000?” They say, “sure, no problem, but we’ll charge you interest.” So you take your now $200,000 and invest it (really it’s just $100,000 + $100,000 loaned against that). Your investment doubles. You now have $400,000 in a bank account. If you had only invested your $100,000, unleveraged, and your investment doubled, you’d have $200,000. Instead you used leverage and now you’ve made $200,000 instead of $100,000 by using 2 to 1 leverage (minus fees and interest). Let’s say for the sake of argument your fees and interest came out to $50,000 over the course of the investment, you pay back $150,000 to the bank. You still come out ahead with $150,000 profit + your original $100,000. More than double the initial amount, that’s the power of leverage.

HOWEVER, if your investment falls by 50%, you lose everything. How? Well you need to have a way to repay the bank, so the money you have is collateral for their loan. If your investment in stocks drops by 50% you’ll have $100,000 in your account, which is exactly enough to repay the bank. So you’ll get “margin called” which is when the bank sells stocks on your behalf and will pay back their loan. Just like that you go from $100,000 to nothing. So leverage has 2 sides, and the downside risk can be quite large and scary which is why most people should never play with leverage. Yes you can make astronomical returns, but you can go broke just as quickly. So… Real Estate, the thing we all live in, is leveraged 5 to 1… Let’s talk about it.

After what I’ve just told you about how leverage can destroy you’re investment, you’re probably thinking to yourself, “surely, no bank would be crazy enough to lend more than 2x or 3x to a VERY smart investor,” well do I have news for you. Every day, people are going out there, going to their banks and being provided a loan for 5x-20x the money they plan to spend on their home. How does that make any sense? Well, apparently, we’ve all decided that the most stable asset in existence is land, and homes. Every bank and government has decided collectively that homeownership is a right of sorts and it has resulting in lending policies that allow for this type of leverage. If you get into “low down payment” mortgages it gets even more crazy.

So lets take a look at an example. You have $100,000 that you want to spend on a home. About $10,000 of that will go to land transfer tax, lawyer fees, home inspections etc. So your investment after cost of doing business is closer to $90,000. Lets create 2 scenarios, both will factor in a renter investing in stocks vs. equivalent homeowner. I’ll try to provide actual examples of houses and rents too. A point that I think is important to make here is that past performance is never an indicator of future results, that goes for stocks and the housing market and there are a lot of things that influence both these markets in a big way, this is a historical example, and may not pan out exactly the same way in the future. But I hope it is illustrative.

Scenario 1: 20% Down Payment (5 to 1 leverage)

In 1999 $90,000 as a 20% down payment means that you can buy $450,000 worth of home. What does that get you?

In one of Mississauga’s nicer neighborhoods Lorne Park, that would get you a 4 bed, 3-4 bath, 2000-2500 sq. ft. home, 2 car garage, possibly with a pool.

A 5-year fixed mortgage rate would have been around 7.5% at the time.

Your monthly mortgage payment would be approximately $2600 per month, add in your other home expenses and let’s say $3000 per month.

Now, how much would a similar home cost to rent at the time?

I’m seeing around $2300-2500/month, so let’s call it $2500 after expenses again.

$500 less per month to rent.

Now that the stage is set, let’s do some math shall we.

Let’s assume the renter family’s put their initial $100,000 into an S&P 500 index fund and the $500 per month in savings goes into this same fund, so $6000 per year extra. Meanwhile, the other family’s savings gets dumped completely into home and mortgage we’ll also say that both families start in January of 1999 and the extra $6000 is added at the start of each year. We’ll just say that both families succumb to lifestyle inflation with the extra income over the years so their numbers don’t change. What happens?

Renter family:

YearS&P 500 ROI Added dollars ($)Portfolio Value ($)
199919.53%6,000126,701
2000-10.14%6,000119,245
2001-13.04%6,000108,913
2002-23.37%6,00088,058
200326.38%6,000118,871
20048.99%6,000136,096
20053.00%6,000146,359
200613.62%6,000173,111
20073.53%6,000185,433
2008-38.49%6,000117,750
200923.45%6,000152,770
201012.78%6,000179,061
20110.00%6,000185,061
201213.41%6,000216,682
201329.60%6,000288,596
201411.39%6,000328,151
2015-0.37%6,000332,915
20169.54%6,000371,247
201719.42%6,000450,509
2018-6.24%6,000428,023
201928.88%6,000559,368
202016.62%6,000659,333
202126.89%6,000844,241
2022-19.44%6,000684,954
202324.23%6,000858,372

Owner family by 2023: Home value $1,650,000-$1,750,000, mortgage paid off.

The average housing price growth in this time period was around 10% per year for detached homes. I tried to find actual houses on the market that have recently sold as a more true indicator of value rather than just computing the average. As you can see, due to the leverage that mortgages allowed you are now twice as wealthy as the person who invested in stocks, you own the home rent free, and you can accelerate your own savings on top of owning this now expensive home and outpace the stock investor even more. Meanwhile, the other family’s rent and expenses will have gone up and they may have had to move a few times because of owners selling homes. Stability is not quite the same, and while $800,000 is an impressive sum of money, it’s still half as much as the homeowner, even with historically higher growth in stocks than average.

What about the future of housing?

People are predicting that the next decade will not see the same returns on housing as the last two decades, but having a home even as an investment rather than leaving money in stocks can mean that while a tenant is paying down your mortgage for you, there will be money left over for you to continue investing in stocks, rinse and repeat, buy more homes get more tenants. Yes it is somewhat clinical, but the more people you have building your home equity, the more “streams” of income you will eventually have when all those homes are paid off, or you just sell them for a ton of money. Every home is a vehicle to 5x or more leverage, you’re controlling a $450,000 asset in our example with only $90,000. Yes you do have to pay interest and you’re “burning” a lot of money in interest every year, but even after all those fees, you’ve done well! I’m again stressing that past does not equal future. Who knows what the future holds! But historically, real estate has been the way to go, and every wealthy person I’ve ever met has some amount of holdings in real estate or land. Because they aren’t making any more of it!

Now there are a million ways to invest in real estate and make a return on investment much quicker than this believe it or not. One of those ways would be purchasing a home in need of some repair and then selling it, what people call “sweat equity” or “forced appreciation”, making it worth more to the market. This is more risk, but in theory more reward. But I’m more of a believer in the long game and just trying to acquire as many beans as possible so my pile of beans can be huge.

Let’s move onto scenario 2.

Scenario 2: 5% Down Payment (20 to 1 leverage)

Here’s a bit of a history lesson for you. The 5% down payment rule came into effect around 1995, and we proceeded to see two decades of the highest appreciation rates in the history of the GTA Real Estate Market. I’m not going to talk too much about government policies and what could have been different, maybe some other time, for now we’ll just accept this as it is. So in the grand year of 1999 before the dot com bubble, we can now leverage our money 20x! Woohoo! (probably).

The rules at the time were 5% up to 500,000 then 10% down up to $1 million. So if you buy a $999,999 house, your down payment is 7.5%, so not quite 20x leverage. Let’s say that you buy a $999,999 house in this scenario with 7.5% down, or $74,999 and you burn the other $25,000 on fees and mortgage insurance.

This budget, allows us to buy a home under $1,000,000 on the prestigious Mississauga Rd. north of the QEW. 4-5 Bed 8 Bath, over 5000 sq ft. Probably what we’d call a McMansion nowadays. In 2023 this caliber of home sold for $3.8 Million to $4.0 Million. Your monthly mortgage payments on this at 7.5% interest would be around $7,000 a month with property tax and everything else lets call it $9,000 a month. From what I can see online to rent a similar property would have been around $5000 a month call it $6000 after other expenses. Which is $3000 savings per month, or $36,000 per year. So lets take a look at this $100,000 stock investment, this time with $36,000 getting added per year.

YearS&P 500 ROIAdded dollars ($)Portfolio Value ($)
199919.53%36,000162,560
2000-10.14%36,000178,426
2001-13.04%36,000186,465
2002-23.37%36,000170,475
200326.38%36,000260,943
20048.99%36,000323,638
20053.00%36,000370,427
200613.62%36,000461,783
20073.53%36,000515,355
2008-38.49%36,000339,138
200923.45%36,000463,108
201012.78%36,000562,894
20110.00%36,000598,894
201213.41%36,000720,033
201329.60%36,000979,819
201411.39%36,0001,131,521
2015-0.37%36,0001,163,202
20169.54%36,0001,313,605
201719.42%36,0001,611,699
2018-6.24%36,0001,544,882
201928.88%36,0002,037,441
202016.62%36,0002,418,047
202126.89%36,0003,113,941
2022-19.44%36,0002,537,592
202324.23%36,0003,197,174

Decided to use excel this time. In this second scenario, because you’re dumping so much money per year into stocks you end up within about $600,000 of the purchasing couple, but they STILL end up ahead. Another reminder that this time frame saw the most appreciation in stocks and real estate in known history. But again, even with the higher interest rate and extra mortgage insurance fees, the purchasing couple still ended up ahead of the renter couple, even with their prudent savings and investing plan. Many people also don’t know how to buy and hold when it comes to stocks and most retail investors underperform the market, as well as many professional investors, so this is an extremely optimistic ROI in the stock portfolio. Meanwhile getting someone to move their home is a much more arduous process and a more illiquid asset, but this is a benefit in a way because it means that you give the asset the proper amount of time it needs to appreciate in value.

So now we’ve seen both scenarios, and both point to the fact that purchasing a home has been the better way to build wealth in Canada in the past 2 decades. Will this be the same in the future? As mentioned many economist are predicting that the real estate market will not see the same returns as the past. But I still believe that due to the ability to leverage your money so highly, with the asset class being relatively stable (for now), makes it a great way to build wealth, and the ability to repeat the process with multiple properties provides growth that you simply won’t be able to duplicate in the stock market. You’re fundamentally limited by one income, but by being a landlord you are dumping many incomes into this investment idea.

Now there is an amount of stress to having that much leverage on your shoulders, if your home value drops 20% and you need to sell you won’t be able to get your down payment out. But just writing those words down unless you buy at the absolute peak and overextend yourself like crazy and lose your job at the same time, a 20% drop is an EXTREMELY uncommon occurrence in our real estate market, in stocks however, there were multiple 20% drops in that 25 year time frame, again psychologically, can be a hard time to sit there and watch your returns on paper take a nosedive. But no one really knows the day to day value of their house and even if the markets having a bad year most people aren’t going to jump to the conclusion that they need to sell.

There is one small dent in this math, and that’s condominiums. Condos have seen much more muted appreciation over the past 25 years compared to freehold housing types, the shift has been very pronounced in the post-covid years with a condo oversupply on the market and a lot of new condo inventory coming online at this moment in time. The price recovery in condos is going to be much slower than freehold but they did still appreciate at about 5-6% per year. So if we assumed a condo buyer vs. a condo renter, the numbers might be somewhat different. But if a condo is solely an investment property for you, it’s still likely that you’ll see good returns in the long run.

Newsletter Email Archive Sent: Nov 26, 2024:

Newsletter #26: Thought Experiment of Real Estate Investing vs. Stocks, US Market News

This Weeks Blog Post:

Investing $100,000 in stocks vs. Real Estate 25 years ago:

  • This post is a discussion about leverage and how real estate is a somewhat unmatched way to leverage your money.
  • Two scenarios leveraging money to purchase real estate vs. stocks
  • Remember, past performance doesn’t predict future results

Read the full article here: https://oliverfoote.ca/investing-100000-in-stocks-vs-real-estate-25-years-ago/

Market Talk:

  • In case you missed it and wanted to hear my discussion with mortgage broker Deren Hasip I would highly recommend watching the video or listening to the podcast. We discuss the upcoming mortgage rule changes on Dec 15, 2024. How the US election may effect Canada. Some professional tips and tricks with mortgages. Examples of new rule changes on purchasing power for first time buyers.
  • YouTube: https://youtu.be/8XyHEV1c7R4
  • Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4vzu7YYs4SUBTTg1dILL22
  • The Canadian Dollar has been suffering a bit thanks to comments that Trump has made about tariffs on Canada. If that does happen there is the possibility that the Bank of Canada will be hesitant to drop mortgage rates and we may see inflation return. These are worst case scenarios and we can hope that not everything will come to pass from the new administration, but one this is for sure that there will be changes, likely economically.

Stock Market Performance as of Tuesday Nov 26, 2024:

S&P 500: 6,013.13 (+26.79% YTD)
NASDAQ: 19,136.73 (+29.60% YTD)
S&P/TSX Composite: 25,383.73 (+21.62% YTD)

Macroeconomics Statistics:

Canada’s CPI Inflation Sep 2024: 2.0% (0.4% Increase from Sept 2024)
Current BoC Benchmark Interest Rate: 3.75% (0.5% Decrease on Oct 23, 2024)
Unemployment Rate October 2024: 6.5% (0.1% Decrease from Sept 2024)

Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Real Estate Stats – October 2024:

YTD Average Selling Price: $1,121,871
YTD % Change in Average Selling Price: -1.0%
Y-o-Y (comparing Octobers) % Change in Average Selling Price: +1.1%

YTD Number of MLS Sales: 58,435
YTD % Change in MLS Sales: +0.1%

Y-o-Y (comparing Octobers) % Change in MLS Sales: +44.4%
Number of MLS Sales in October: 6,658
Y-o-Y (comparing Octobers) % Change in Active Listings: +25.3%
Number of Active Listings in October: 24,481

Inventory Available: 3.5 Months (Decrease from 5.0 Months in Sept 2024)

Subscribe to our newsletter!