It doesn’t take an evil genius to realize that the main thing driving housing costs so high in Canada around major economic centres is a lack of supply compared to the crazy demand we have. Last year we welcomed over 1,000,000 people to the country from immigration, international students, and most recently war refugees. Similar numbers are expected for 2023. The housing crunch will only continue to get worse because our pace of construction is not currently and likely cannot keep up with the demand anytime soon. There are a lot of things that caused these problems and continue to make it challenging to solve them, today I’ll discuss a few of them.
A study back in 2020 between Urbanation and the Federation of Rental Housing in Ontario was anticipating a rental unit shortfall of 200,000 units in the coming decade a new report published just 3 years later quotes the shortage at 300,000 units. The pandemic economy is one big factor that likely made these problems worse. The momentum of building new housing slowed temporarily and construction costs exploded as inflation took hold. Followed shortly thereafter by the rapid increase in interest rates. This meant that simultaneously while costs were still high, the cost of money was also high. Causing many rental and condo projects to be outright cancelled or delayed. This means that around 3-5 years from now when construction was supposed to be completed on all these new pre-construction projects that didn’t sell this year, as well as rental housing projects that were stopped due to cost overruns. We will experience even tighter supply on the market due to the high interest rate environment we are currently experiencing.
Secondly, we stopped building rental housing through the 80’s and 90’s for a variety of reasons. Similar to today the 80’s were a period of very high inflation, construction costs exploded, and government policies were put into place which tried to transfer the construction of purpose built rental housing onto the private market. In 1968 the first condominium project was sold in Toronto. They were seen as a way for people to own the apartment they lived in rather than rent it. This aligned with the Canadian dream of “own your home” and made it easier for governments to justify slowing their investment in housing. As we’ve learned from decades of underinvestment and very exclusionary zoning bylaws. In a rapidly growing economy like ours turns out that solely relying on the private market to supply all the housing was not a great idea.
According to this report by the FRPO, Urbanation, BILD, and Finnegan Marshall published February 9, 2023. They state that purpose built rentals made up 9% of new rental housing supply in the GTA over the last 10 years and 90% of purpose built rentals were constructed between 1960-1979 (approx. 223,954 units). There is an interesting line in this report that bears quoting, “looking forward, more challenging investment economics should lead to a reduced share of condo investors who buy-and-hold and a lower level of new condo launches, placing more emphasis on the development of purpose-built rentals.” As is stands today around 59% of all condos in the GTA are purchased by investors. However, the report is essentially saying that as construction costs continue to climb, buying condos as investments will become a more and more challenging proposition as the number of units that cash flow positively on closing continues to decline. Construction costs quite sticky and often outpace inflation so it’s unlikely that there will be any relief to make condominiums affordable again.
One shocking and problematic statistic is that we are only on track to add 135,000 new rental units between condos and purpose built rentals, but we will still be short by 177,000 units. One of the biggest barriers to getting projects completed is the development timeline taking on average 100 months, which is about as long as it will take my to pay off my student loans. It will take a focused effort to shorten this timeline as a majority of the delays stem from paperwork, not actual construction. If a lot of red tape does get removed, I think there will be some very good opportunities for developers and people who understand how to re-develop properties into multi-units. They will be contributing to the rental housing supply, and it will likely become easier from a zoning standpoint to push these projects through.
Another interesting dynamic at play here is immigration. Canada was built on immigration, and we have an amazing culture and country that welcomes people from every part of the world to try and build a better life. Canada is a place where everyone should feel safe no matter where you’re from and everyone is connected by the fact that we are all Canadians despite our diverse and different cultures. From an economic standpoint without immigration we would have a declining population, which would mean fewer workers, and with baby boomers retiring the Canada Pension Plan would be somewhat screwed without new workers to replace the ones who are retiring and living longer than ever. So from a purely economic standpoint we need immigration. But one thing is clear, we’ve done a terrible job planning for it.
To be fair, some of it was unplanned, like the war in Ukraine. But even within the immigration which we control, we don’t seem to be managing it very well. There seems to be a consensus brewing that if we plan to welcome so many people, we have to have housing for them to live in. I’ve personally come across some crazy situations in my real estate work, one such situation being students who are living 7 people to a 1 bedroom apartment in Mississauga to keep their costs down while studying in Canada. I can hardly fault them for wanting to save money, but this is not what I would consider healthy living conditions and it is concerning that we are allowing people to live in those kinds of conditions.
There is no easy solution to this problem, but it is heartening to see all this data that is now coming out identifying real numbers on what needs to be done in order to correct course. It is also good to see many new government policies that are addressing difficult zoning restrictions and allowing up to 3 units on almost any pre-existing single family zoned lot, as well as easier application processes for “laneway suites”. We are also starting to see an emphasis on getting people to work in the trades, because even if we approve all these new construction projects, we need people to build them and surprise surprise, we don’t have enough. I could go on for hours about our trades problem as well as zoning bylaws. But for now I’ll leave the discussion here and you want to learn more about how these topics fit into this housing puzzle subscribe to my newsletter because that’s what I’ll be discussing in two weeks! Subscribe to newsletter here.
(Link to next post coming Dec 24, 2023…).
Thank you for reading and we’ll chat soon,
Oliver Foote