The Future of Interest Rates: Will They Fall in 2024?

The economy is like trying to steer a cargo ship but the captain is missing and all the wheels are the wrong size. If you change the angle of the ship heading by 1 degree, you won’t notice the subtle change for the first few minutes, similarly the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) interest rate decisions can take 12-18 months to show up in the data. Well here we are around 21 months since the first rate hike in March 2022 and we’re finally starting to see those decisions showing up in the economy. 

I’m not going to pretend I can predict the future, but I do want to talk about some economic signs that I’ve been reading about recently that point towards the next step in the BoC’s rate setting to be more holds and eventually a rate cut. If I’ve learned anything about this past interest rate and inflation cycle, it’s that things take longer than most forecasters had predicted.  

To being the discussion I wanted to talk about the most recent Monetary Policy report from the Bank of Canada published October 2023. It indicates slightly negative GDP growth in the second quarter (Q2) of 2023 and a return to positive growth in the third quarter (Q3) of 2023. (*Note: Statistics Canada recently reported Q3 GDP as declining 1.06% and revised Q2 up from -0.2% to +1.4%) Their overall projection for 2023 is positive GDP growth. However, the per capita GDP declined 1.6% compared to last year. In my opinion per capita growth is a better indicator of the direction the economy is heading since Canada has a rapidly growing population. This effectively means that on a per person basis spending is declining and our economy is slowing. Additionally, businesses aren’t borrowing as much money to fund their capital expenditures because of the high interest rate environment; more business investment generally indicates a growing economy.

Secondly, the most recently reading of CPI inflation from the Bank of Canada was 3.1% in October 2023 which is getting very close to the BoC’s target range of 1-3%. A decline in gasoline prices was the largest contributor to the lower inflation reading. This also happens to be one of the more unstable components that make up the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Depending on what is happening globally energy costs can be very volatile. On the flip side the BoC has stated that supply chain issues have very significantly improved compared to this time last year. As a result, the bank will likely want to wait and see how things play out in other sectors of the economy in the coming months before making any more rate decisions. I don’t anticipate their decision will come quickly since there are still large components of CPI like energy, and rents which are continuing to be inflationary.

Thirdly, as it relates to housing. The housing market has seen a significant increase in supply over the past 3 months with the fewest number of sales for an October period since 1999 according to an Urbanation based on TRREB data. Due to the higher interest rates many people are opting to rent rather than purchase which has put a significant amount of upward pressure on rental prices. We are entering a seasonally slower time of year where many people tend to put off looking for new housing until the new year, so there has been a bit of a short term softening in rental prices.

However, if housing prices continue to remain elevated while interest rates are high, rents will also continue to climb. Sellers are having a hard time coming to terms with the value their home will sell at right now because there is so much competing inventory on the market. People who took on variable rates during 2021 and the beginning of 2022 are the ones who are hit the hardest right now with their borrowing costs more than doubling since then. Banks have been very accommodating to borrowers in some cases extending amortizations to 40 years or beyond in order to keep people in their homes, which has kept mortgage delinquency rates near all time lows and partly why we haven’t seen any significant increase in bank sale homes or general fire sales.

Continuing on the resale housing side of things, the average selling price of a resale home has increased from this time last year. This is mainly due to a skewing in home sales towards higher priced homes and a significant reduction in activity in the first time buyer category. Move-up buyers are finding homes more affordable comparatively to a year or two ago. Meanwhile, first time buyers are finding themselves priced out because purchasing power has declined 40% from the low rates at the end of 2021. An interesting development in the downtown Toronto core (C01) market is that condos are now oversupplied with 7 months of standing inventory. Part of the explanation for this could be that many investors took on variable rate mortgages during 2021. Since 40% of condos in downtown are investor owned if they bought at elevated prices its likely they are now negatively cash flowing and spending a good chunk of money every month to own their investment which partly explains the flood of inventory. 

This presents a very good opportunity if you are a first-time buyer and want to break into the downtown condo market. Finding a tenanted property could provide more of an advantage to getting a good price. Due to many other buyers purchasing as investors they will likely want a vacant property and will not want to take on a tenant because the rents will likely be too low to carry their new mortgage and applying for an above guideline rent increase in a rent controlled unit can be challenging.

If you earnestly plan to move into the condo and live there for at least one year you can give the tenant 90-day notice and have them move out and move in yourself. Then down the line if you were to move out you might be able to hang onto the property and rent it for market rates and use it to leverage into your next property. If my prediction that interest rates will come down in the coming years turns out to be correct, your property will likely see accelerated appreciation as rates get cut, as well as lower mortgage payments if you were to take on a variable rate mortgage.

In a few years you could refinance and lock in a fixed rate then take out some of the equity from the property to the point where it would can cash flow neutrally. You can then use that cash to put a down payment on the next property, rent out the old one, repeat. Even if you don’t want to refinance, I think a lot of would-be investors and first time buyers don’t quite understand the opportunity that this market presents with the ultra slow sales, pick of the litter (lots of supply), and a consensus view that rates will be coming down. The market is essentially giving potential buyers an easy lay-up to make their investment work in long term in exchange for short term pain. Obviously there are risks to this like anything, but barring anything crazy like another pandemic, I think we are very very close to a market bottom and I believe that people will look back on this time and say “I wish I had.”

Fourth, there is a somewhat concerning development. According to Urbanation new construction home sales have hit a 10 year low which does not bode well for the future supply of housing. One of the only ways that new housing supply gets built in the Greater Toronto Area is through new construction condos. However, there is a slow development happening in the purpose built rental space. Governments at all levels are beginning to put real money towards building this type of housing again, but it will take years for this to make a significant dent in the housing supply.

In the meanwhile the housing supply outlook is somewhat grim for the next decade or so. If the replacement cost of a condo continues to remain much higher than the current market value of a similar unit, investors and end users are unlikely to see the value in purchasing new construction which could cause a noticeable slowdown in new housing starts (construction) which will constrict housing supply even more. On the flip side, developers are providing an unprecedented amount of incentives, including rental guarantees for multiple years, zero development charges, and very extended deposit structures in order to try stimulate sales. 

In conclusion, the housing market is showing signs of a slowing as rates stay high. Pricing remains elevated due to a lack of overall supply in the market, the rate of population growth in the GTA as well as the resiliency in employment and accommodating banks. The continuous influx of new people to Canada could potentially slow the decline of inflation compared to the US. Ultimately, people still need a place to live which should continue to stimulate a floor level of sales until the interest rate environment loosens a bit at which point home sales a prices will likely stabilize and begin a slow climb upwards. Although inflation is coming down, the bank will likely not make a decision on rates until the less volatile or “core” components return back to normal levels. Expect things to continue to move slowly like the freighter ship with a slow return to a normal inflation levels as very slow rate cuts in the new couple of years.

Talk soon,

Oliver Foote

Landmark Court Decision in the US regarding Realtor commission, NAR sued for $1.8 Billion:

This headline seems to be everywhere in the past week, and if you haven’t seen it well, welcome to my world. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) in the US is known to be a big lobbying organization and it’s Canadian counterpart CREA is also quite good at lobbying. With real estate values being so high, and so much money flowing into the industry, these big organizations have a lot of sway. 

The plaintiffs were a group of sellers in Missouri who brought forward a case stating that the seller in a real estate transaction has to pay for both the buyer and the seller agent fee. Effectively masking the cost of working with a realtor from the buyer which they were claiming was an anti-competitive practice. Another issue in the case was that the NAR controls the MLS (think Realtor.ca or HouseSigma), where most people go to find the home they plan to buy. Prior to this lawsuit, the NAR had a stipulation on the MLS system that in order for a seller to list a home they had to offer at least 1 cent to the buyers agent which played into the anti-competitive nature of the suit, basically the NAR positioned themselves at gatekeepers to the largest selling marketplace. I can think of a few other companies, cough cough Apple App Store, that acts as a gatekeeper to app developers who want to get their apps out there by restricting other app stores or the ability to “side load” apps. 

The jury did find the NAR and Keller Williams Realty, one of the largest brokerages in the US, guilty of anti-competitive practices. Naturally, the defendants did say they are going to appeal the decision. Overall, I think it is a good thing anytime anti-trust lawsuits are successful as generally the outcome is more competition and the ruling in this court case could mean that sellers don’t have to front the commission for the buying and the selling agent which could increase competition. One of the main arguments of the NAR for the seller paying both fees is because buyers already have to come up with a down payment and other fees already associated with a purchase out of pocket. So this ruling could potentially make the barrier to purchasing a home even higher for buyers.

So, what does this mean for Canada? Will there be a similar lawsuit brought forward here, now that this case was successful in the US?

As of this very moment, I don’t see this being the case. There are many brokerages that do offer reduced commissions in Canada and some brokerages offer “mere listings” where someone can sell their own home on the MLS without using a realtor. Which are two of the bigger arguments that the plaintiffs used in the US case. We are also instructed in our education courses that as a buyer’s agent we are required to show a listing regardless of what a seller is offering if it is going to potentially be the right fit for the buyer. In practice this is a bit more complicated. In these cases the buyer will likely end up being asked to pay for part of the fee depending on the contract with the buyers agent. In a marketplace where all other homes don’t require that same buyer to pay the realtors fee, it can be a difficult, or even impossible pill for a buyer to swallow depending on how much they planned and saved for. 

Update Dec 10, 2023: It has been brought to my attention that there is a similar attempted class action lawsuit that has been filed but is still many steps away from making it to trial in Canada. They have made some ground trying to name some Brokerage’s as a defendants who agreed to some allegedly anti-competitive rules set out by TRREB. We’ll see what ends up happening and if the class gets Certified. Note this lawsuit is focused in Toronto.

Historically in Canada there have been many times where flat rate brokerages or reduced commission brokerages come around and offer a reduced fee. But when times get difficult in a slower market like today, they can struggle to survive and often go out of business relatively quickly. When it is tough to sell your home people tend to get a certain level of comfort coming from someone who does this as their full time job rather than the 50% of agents who are part-timers. I find that as long as a realtor is doing a good job of explaining to a seller what they are getting for their services, most sellers tend to see the value in investing the money to make the home selling process smooth, easy and to get a good price for their home. The Greater Toronto Area has so many realtors the competition is very high and the level of service that an agent has to provide has to be very good in order to shine amongst the crowd of “everyone is an agent”.

Also depending on where you’re looking, ‘typical’ commission rates do vary around the province, for example in Kitchener/Waterloo, Hamilton, St. Catharines and other outer markets commissions can be lower, but so is the cost of doing business overall. As always, everything can be negotiated, you just have to ensure that the person you are hiring to sell your home is going to provide you with a service level that you can be happy with.

There is also new legislation coming into effect on Dec 1, 2023 called the Trust in Real Estate Services Act (TRESA) which will replace the old 2002 legislation in an aim to increase transparency and consumer choice in their real estate purchases or sales in the province of Ontario. 

One of the biggest changes that will be put into place is the process of open bidding. Sellers will have the option to sell their homes in an open bidding process where they can instruct their agent to disclose the price of an offer and the conditions of an offer to all the other buyer’s agents who have shown interest in their home. 

This is a positive change overall and some sellers will opt for this more transparent process and may see it as an advantage to disclose what other people are offering since it may allow buyers who do have the budget and the desire to purchase a home to outbid their competition. I suspect some sellers will decide to continue with the blind bidding process as they may see this to be more advantageous since buyers have to do a bit more guesswork as to where the final price will land. Depending on how the market is at any given time, your specific situation, and how much activity a house is getting, there will be advantages and disadvantages to each method. 

It will be interesting to see how this open bidding rule will change the marketplace. I do think that new companies will be formed thanks to this legislation that puts houses up for sale in an “auction” style sale, whether this is an online auction or an in-person auction. The seller would set a reserve or minimum sale price publicly or they can set their price internally, which would be a “sale on approval” strategy. The latter would allow them to either accept or deny the highest price within a certain timeframe. The exact particulars of the legislation are still being worked out, and auction companies like this do already exist for selling homes, it’s just a matter of how well this will catch on with consumers. 

In Australia, they do have this style of open bidding where everyone who wants to purchase the home will show up to the house on the day of the auction and then it proceeds as a typical in person auction would with an auctioneer. I remember watching this air on television years ago and at the time Australia was going through it’s own housing crisis and prices were still sky high even with the this transparent method of bidding so I don’t imagine this single thing will be the silver bullet that fixes our housing affordability problems.